|

Therevid
larva (Tasmania). Image copyright: S.L. Winterton
|
|

Therevid
larva (Thereva furcata). Image copyright: M.E. Irwin
|
Biology & Ecology
Biology
Egg. The egg is 0.4-0.8 mm long, ovoid milky white, and
without reticulation. The number of eggs laid by each individual seems
to vary from about twenty five to about a hundred. (Lyneborg 1992).
Larvae. As far as is
known there are five larval stadia, the last of which either pupates or
goes into diapause. Therevids are usually univoltine, but instances where
two or more years are needed to complete the life cycle are known in European
Thereva species (Lyneborg 1992). The larvae are smooth and vermiform,
with a rather well developed head with an apically spatulate tentorial
rod (Irwin & Lyneborg 1981a, Irwin & Lyneborg 1981b). The abdomen
is secondarily divided into some 16 apparent segments, and terminates
in a pair of tiny pseudopods (Woodley 1989). The snake-like larvae are
very mobile and move with considerable speed through sand and loose soil
(Lyneborg 1992). They are found mainly in sand or soil close to the surface
(English 1950). Therevid larvae are voracious predators, feeding on a
great variety of insect larvae and earthworms, but preferring Coleoptera
larvae. At least one New Zealand species has developed a cleptoparasitoid
way of life (Lyneborg 1992). In captivity, therevid larvae can be fed
on larvae of flour beetles, but should be separated as they can be cannibalistic.
Pupae. In the prepupal
stage the larva assumes a curved position in the soil, somewhat like the
letter U, or almost in a circle (Lyneborg 1992). The pupal stage lasts
for only a week or two. The pupa is especially vulnerable to desiccation
and to attack by predators (Lyneborg 1992).
Adults. In contrast
to much of the world's therevid fauna, many species of Australian Therevidae
are brightly coloured, elongate flies with largely glabrous bodies. Bright
colouration, long antennae, body shape, together with behavioural modification,
often results in wasp mimics, particularly in genera such as Agapophytus
and Ectinorhynchus (Power 1998, Winterton & Irwin 2001). Many
genera have attractively patterned wings and males with distinctive silvery
pruinescent markings on the body. Many species show marked sexual dimorphism.
The antennae are sometimes very distinctive, such as the greatly elongate
scape in Agapophytus and the thickened scape in Neodialineura.
Habitats
Adults frequent a wide variety of habitats, but have the greatest biodiversity
in semiarid regions of the world (Irwin 1976, Winterton et al.
1999). A large proportion of Anabarhynchus species seem to be associated
with coastal scrub and sandy beaches, habitats that are extensively exploited
by therevids all over the world (Lyneborg, 1992). In Australia, many genera
are found in semiarid areas and dry sclerophyll forests, but few are found
in wet sclerophyll forests and rainforests.
Field work in Australia continues
to regularly uncover specimens of undescribed species.
Habits
Adult therevids are seemingly all diurnal (Lyneborg 1992); however, there
are many records of Australian therevids from many genera, including mating
pairs, being collected at light during the night. Some genera only appear
in the early hours of the morning (A. Zwick pers.com.).
Little is known of the food
habits of Australian therevids, but adult therevids appear to feed on
honeydew, flower nectar and pollen. Many taxa inhabiting subtropical regions
with winter rain (i.e. parts of California, the Mediterranean area, southwestern
Africa, and probably also south-western Australia) often have an elongated,
projecting proboscis, and are recorded as visiting flowers, taking nourishment
in the form of nectar (Lyneborg 1992). Several genera were collected in
numbers from flowers of Baeckea and Nuytsia floribunda
in spring in south-western Western Australia (Lambkin pers. obs). Therevids
need to regularly drink water, and can often be found at drying pools
and springs. Adult therevids
often alight in sunny patches on trails and paths, or rest on sand, rock,
leaves, stems, and tree trunks. They have a rapid flight of short duration.
The flying period for some of the more common species is usually 3-4 months
(Lyneborg 1992). In semi-arid and arid environments, therevids are stongly
attracted to water. Pools of water in drying creek beds often attract
a tremendous diversity of these flies. Many of the field photos included
in this key were taken along the edges of such pools.
Lek formation on the trunks
of large, smooth-barked trees has been observed in the males of some species
of Agapophytus. At various sites in south-eastern Queensland, males
were observed forming small oval-shaped leks of up to eight individuals
on the shaded side of the tree approximately 12 metres above the
ground. Periodically, most members of the lek take-off and fly in a tight
loop perpendicular to the trunk and land again in approximately the same
position within the lek. Mating was observed on two occasions and took
place on the other side of the same tree or on a nearby tree. Males of
second species were observed forming slightly smaller sized leks on the
sunlit side of a tree approximately 0.5 metres above the ground (Winterton
& Irwin 2001).
Males of some species form hovering swarms. The female enters a swarm
and is caught by a male, and copulation takes place (Lyneborg 1992). Males
of Ectinorhynchus can often be seen hovering in small swarms above
and among shrubs in sheltered but sunny positions. Oviposition
behaviour has been described by Irwin (1976). Many Australian therevids
appear to belong to the group in which the female abdomen is embedded
in the substrate by thrusting and contorting it until a major part is
buried. As soon as the egg is laid, the abdomen is withdrawn.
|

Sand
Dune habitat. Windorah, Queensland. Image copyright: J.H. Skevington.
|
|

Birdsville
Region, Queensland. Image copyright: S.L. Winterton.
|
Ecology
There have not been many extensive studies on the ecology of the family
Therevidae. The larvae, like most underground dwellers, are rarely encountered
unless these soils are actively sieved. They twist violently when exposed
and are extremely quick and agile in their attempts to escape. Even pupae
when disturbed will wiggle vigorously in an attempt to scare away intruders.
Adults have been described as secretive, and in most circumstances are
rarely collected by hand. Many are caught in well-placed Malaise traps
along flight paths near moisture. The individuals captured this way provide
no information about their ecology. Many times, adults may be found mating
on the soil surface, and being thus encumbered and somewhat preoccupied,
can be more easily observed and hand netted. Most published works include
ecological observations that are more anecdotal than systematically gathered.
One of the most intensive
quantitative surveys of Therevidae was conducted in Australia in 1997-1998.
A long-term Malaise trapping study near Brisbane was completed by Narelle
Power as part of her Honours thesis at the University of Queensland. Narelle
trapped therevid specimens using eleven 6 metre Focks Malaise traps based
in three diverse habitats: coastal heath on Bribie Island, sclerophyll
forest in Brisbane Forest Park, and rainforest at Mt Glorious. The weekly
collections revealed a very diverse fauna of Therevidae in southeast Queensland.
Over 1,000 Therevidae belonging to 15 genera and 52 species were collected
over a 54 week period (Power 1998).
Individual abundance varied
across the three sites with 47.5% of specimens collected from sclerophyll
forest, coastal heath accounted for 39.2% of the total therevids, and
the rainforest site just 13.3%. Individual species appear to be spatially
restricted, with site species diversity related to the heterogeneity of
the environment (Power, 1998). The majority of therevid species were represented
by few individuals, with ten represented by less than 3 individuals. The
results of an analysis of seasonal abundance were significant, finding
that most specimens and all species were taken in spring (September-November)
(Power 1998). Cooler southern areas of Australia may reflect the seasonal
abundance in New Zealand, where three species of adult therevids have
been collected during September, 16 during October, 30 during November,
36 during December, 37 during January, 30 during February, 13 during March,
and 3 during April (Lyneborg, 1992). A similar situation was found in
the genus Agapophytus, with the majority of collection records
in Australia and New Guinea between November and February (Winterton &
Irwin 2001). An American study of the bioecology of therevids (Hartman
et al. 1995) in Sand Ridge State Forest in Mason County, Illinois,
showed no obvious correlation between any of the six therevid species
collected and microhabitat. Females were much less abundantly collected
and were present about a week after the males first appeared. Three species
had single population peaks as would be expected of univoltine species
and two species peaked twice. All species were present in the first population
peak, which occurred in late May to early June. The two most numerous
species then peaked again in late July and early August, suggesting a
second generation. Therevids have typically been thought to produce a
single generation per year but data such as these suggest that some species
are bivoltine. Similarly, a study by Mike Irwin along the Kuiseb River,
Gobabeb, Namibia suggested that adults of some therevid genera may have
a second generation.
Therevids as Bioindicators
Xeric habitats are destroyed at an alarming rate through a number of threatening
processes such as land clearing, salinity and invasive species. We lack
tools to accurately evaluate the impacts of threatening processes on soil-dwelling
invertebrates, underground productivity, and habitat heterogeneity. To
gauge degree and speed of change on these lands, specific bioindicators
that reflect alterations are needed. Generalist predators feeding on subterranean
herbivores are potentially good indicators of diversity, productivity,
and heterogeneity, and in desert communities, they are at the top of the
food chain (Ayal 1998). Thousands of adult therevids have been collected
in a couple of days in single Malaise traps placed across a flight path
in dry gullies in semi-arid areas of Victoria and northern Australia,
and in the forests of the Warrumbungle National Park in New South Wales.
These numbers imply that in these areas there is a high biomass of therevids
in the environment, both of adults and predatory larvae. Easily monitored
above ground, adult numbers mirror below-ground productivity, while their
diversity and richness reflects subterranean heterogeneity (Hartman et
al. 1995). Because the larvae are non-specific predators in the soil,
therevids have often been suggested as potential indicators of soil health.
Furthermore, therevids may have potential for biological control because
they suppress root-feeding pest larvae in sandy agroecosystems. Examination
of the biocontrol and bioindicator possibilities is restricted by deficient
taxonomy. To complement taxonomic and phylogenetic studies, David Carlisle,
a student from Australian National University Canberra, is currently investigating
spatial and temporal emergence patterns of therevid larvae.
 |
Biogeography
Australasia has the world's richest therevid fauna and the genera show
an extraordinary degree of endemism. Of the 24 described genera, 23 are
found only in this region. Australia's aridity is geologically recent
(beginning 25 mya) and many of its therevid species belong to morphologically
similar 'species-swarms' that may have radiated in this period. Species-rich
genera, such as Anabarhynchus, Parapsilocephala and Acraspisa
exemplify these massive radiations. Clearly the Australasian fauna has
evolved and radiated in isolation after the separation of Australia and
New Zealand from Gondwana. As Australia, New Zealand and New Caledonia
have drifted northwards towards Indo-Papua archipelago, only recently
has the Australasian fauna moved into Papua New Guinea and Indonesia.
Irwiniella Lyneborg, found in the Australasian region in Papua
New Guinea and Indonesia is the only adventive originating from Laurasian
stock; Irwiniella is diverse in Asia, and Africa. Reflecting their
Gondwanan heritage, the Australasian therevid fauna evolved after the
separation of Gondwanan continents and their closest relatives can be
found in South America, such as Melanothereva Malloch, Pachyrrhiza
Phillippi and Entisia Oldroyd. Anabarhynchus is the dominant
genus in Australia and New Zealand, but is also known from Papua New Guinea,
New Caledonia and Fiji, and has its closest relatives in South America
(at present some are still incorrectly placed in Anabarhynchus).
Ectinorhynchus is recorded from Australia and New Zealand, but
not Papua New Guinea or New Caledonia; the only genus with this distribution
pattern. Closely related to Ectinorhynchus, Squamopygia
is represented by only one described and one undescribed species from
Tropical North Queensland and Papua New Guinea. Agapophytine genera such
as Agapophytus and Acraspisa are very species-rich in Australia
and are also found in Papua New Guinea and Indonesia, respectively (Winterton
et al. 2001, Winterton and Irwin 200).
|

Drying
creek bed. Chauncyvale Reserve, Tasmania. Image copyright: S.L.
Winterton.
|
References
Ayal Y. (1998). Arthropod communities in deserts are top-down controlled:
An example from the central Negev, Israel. Israel Journal of Zoology
44, 68-92.
English K. (1950). Notes on
the morphology and biology of Anabarrhynchus fasciatus Macq. and
other Australian Therevidae. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of
NSW 75, 345-359.
Hartman M., Irwin M.E. and
Kampmeier G.E. (1995) Habitat partitioning by therevids at Sand Ridge
State Forest. January Report. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign-Urbana.
Irwin M. (1976). Morphology
of the terminalia and known ovipositing behaviour of female Therevidae
(Diptera: Asiloidea), with an account of correlated adaptations and comments
on phylogenetic relationships. Annals of the Natal Museum 22, 913-935.
Irwin M. and Lyneborg L. (1981a).
The genera of Nearctic Therevidae. Bulletin of the Illinois Natural
History Survey 32, 193-277.
Irwin M.E. and Lyneborg L.
(1981b) Therevidae. Manual of Nearctic Diptera. (ed. by B.V.P. J.F. McAlpine,
G.E. Shewell, H.J. Teskey, J.R. Vockeroth & D.M. Wood) 1, pp. 513-523.
Research Branch, Agriculture Canada Monograph, Ottawa.
Lyneborg L. (1992) Therevidae
(Insecta: Diptera). Fauna of New Zealand/ Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa
24, pp. 139. DSIR Plant Protection/ Te Wahanga Manaaki Tupu, Auckland.
Power N. (1998) Temporal and
spatial diversity of Therevidae in South East Queensland (Diptera: Therevidae).
Honours thesis, University of Queensland.
Winterton S.L. and Irwin M.E.
(2001). Phylogenetic revision of Agapophytus Guérin (Diptera:
Therevidae: Agapophytinae). Invertebrate Taxonomy 15, 467-526.
Winterton S.L., Irwin M.E.
and Yeates D.K. (1999). Phylogenetic revision of the Taenogera
Kröber genus-group (Diptera: Therevidae) with descriptions of two
new genera. Australian Journal of Entomology 38, 274-290.
Woodley N. (1989) Phylogeny
and classification of the "Orthorrhaphous" Brachycera. Manual
of Nearctic Diptera. (ed. by J. McAlpine, Wood, DM) 3, pp. 1371-1395.
Research Branch Agriculture Monograph No. 32. Canadian Government Publishing
Centre, Hull.
|